Skip to main content

Trial trenching by Great Chesterford Archaeology Group at The Sycamores, Great Chesterford, 1994 - EEX39596

Please read our .

Map

Location

Grid reference Centred TL 5066 4283 (26m by 25m)
Map sheet TL54SW
Civil Parish GREAT CHESTERFORD, UTTLESFORD, ESSEX

Technique(s)

Organisation

Great Chesterford Archaeological Group

Date

01 Jan 1994 - 31 Dec 1994 at some time

Description

A planning application was submitted for an extension to the Sycamores in August 1993 but the property had remained unoccupied and derelict until in June 1994 permission was obtained from the owner to excavate land at the rear of the property. This land is adjacent to the Old Swaine Adeney site (13748 and 13898) where a burial and both Roman and medieval artefacts had been found. The purpose of the excavation was to establish whether there was any further evidence of occupation before extension work on the house began. 3 trenches, each 2m x 1m were dug. Each had topsoil to a depth of 0.3m to 0.4m containing largely post medieval material. NRHE data transfer: Excavation recovered finds of Roman and medieval date but recorded no archaeological features.

Sources

  • <1> Watching Brief Report: Dey, P.E.. 1994. The Sycamores, Great Chesterford.

Related Monuments/Buildings (2)

  • Medieval finds from the garden to the rear of The Sycamores, Great Chesterford (Find Spot)
  • Roman finds assemblage from the garden to the rear of The Sycamores, School Street, Great Chesterford (Find Spot)

Other References

  • NRHE UID: 1316350
  • Archaeological Investigations Project: C.22.0085

Comments

Do you have any questions or more information about this record? Please feel free to comment below with your name and email address. All comments are submitted to the website maintainers for moderation, and we aim to respond as soon as possible. Comments, questions and answers that may be helpful to other users will be retained and displayed along with the name you supply. The email address you supply will never be displayed or shared.

Comments