Skip to main content

Medieval cropmarks of motte and bailey, Plash Wood, Arkesden (EHER 18361)

Please read our .

Summary

Cropmarks of Motte and Bailey.

Map

Location

Grid reference Centred TL 4862 3479 (444m by 433m)
Civil Parish ARKESDEN, UTTLESFORD, ESSEX

Type and Period

Description

Originally a small mound with bailey surrounded by an outer ditch. The earthwork was situated on a clay ridge but was bulldozed about 20 years ago, Plash Wood deforested and the whole area ploughed. It survives as an amorphous swelling containing lighter sub soil and flint around 0.4m high. Its original size and shape is no longer recognisable on the ground. OS 1975 examination of the plan and the OS APs the earthwork does not resemble the classic motte and bailey plan of circle and appended oval. It is similar in many respects to the ditched enclosures "The Rookery" and "The Crump". According to the farmer who destroyed the site no finds were made. <1> <2> A sketch of the mound with a cross section on the OS card. A rescue excavation was carried out in the "teeth of destruction" by S. Rigold. <3> Cropmarks of outer and inner features. <4> An article on the levelling of Plash Wood refers to a debate as to whether the RCHME should schedule the site. <5> Additional photo refs: <6> Additional field boundaries surrounding the site were mapped in 2008. <7> - <8> 2021. Field survey. The Arkesden History Society on 23rd October 2021 conducted an archaeological fieldwalking survey at Plash Wood field. Prehistoric worked flint and a single piece of medieval pot was identified. The document contains further research on the history of the site from documentary evidence. <9> NRHE data transfer: 1950. Field survey. Small mound with bailey surrounded by an outer ditch in Plash Wood at TL 4855 3475, condition fair but overgrown. <10> Visible as an almost oval soil mark. <11> Now destroyed. <12> The earthwork (no local name) situated on a clay ridge was bulldozed about 20 years ago when Plash Wood was deforested, and the whole area ploughed. It survives as an amorphous swelling about 0.4 m in height containing lighter sub-soil and flint; its original size and shape is no longer recognisable on the ground. Examination of the F1 plan and the OS APs, suggests some affinity with the ditched enclosures "The Rookery" and "The Crump" (TL 42 NE 5,6) considered by Hedges to be medieval ringworks. According to the farmer who destroyed the site no finds were made. <13>

Finds

Sources

  • <1> DESC TEXT: Unknown. 1960 onwards. SMR form unknown. Motte and Bailey TL43 31.
  • <2> Photograph: Hedges, J.D.. 1973. unknown.
  • <3> RECORD SHEET/FORM: Ordnance Survey. 1950-1990. OS cards. TL 43 SE 6.
  • <4> Aerial Photograph: Saunders, H.. 2002. 2002 Aerial Survey by Helen Saunders.
  • <5> Serial: Saffron Walden Weekly News. unknown. Saffron Walden Weekly News. 20/5/1955.
  • <6> Aerial Photograph: Luck, S.. 2006. Cropmarks in Arkesden. Not ECC copyright - June 2006.
  • <7> Aerial Photograph: Microsoft. 2007-2012. Bing Maps Online Resource.
  • <8> GIS Layer: Saunders, H.. 2008-2012. Online Aerial Reconnaissance Project in Essex (OARPE).
  • <9> Fieldwalking Report: Arkesden History Group. 2021. The Plash wood fieldwalking survey.
  • <10> PERSONAL OBSERVATION: Ordnance Survey. Field Investigator's Comments. F1 JET 29-APR-50.
  • <11> Collection: Various. Various. Historic England Archive. APs (OS 67/049 084-5 24.4.67).
  • <12> Collection: Various. Various. Historic England Archive. Essex Arch Rec.
  • <13> PERSONAL OBSERVATION: Ordnance Survey. Field Investigator's Comments. F2 NKB 20-MAR-75.

Related Events (4)

Other References

  • NRHE identifier: 370633
  • National Monuments Record: TL 43 SE 6

Comments

Do you have any questions or more information about this record? Please feel free to comment below with your name and email address. All comments are submitted to the website maintainers for moderation, and we aim to respond as soon as possible. Comments, questions and answers that may be helpful to other users will be retained and displayed along with the name you supply. The email address you supply will never be displayed or shared.

Comments