Skip to main content

Alleged Iron Age occupation site at Lion Point (EHER 81143)

Please read our .

Summary

Early Iron Age occupation site was apparently seen on the foreshore before the construction of the sea wall. However, the evidence for this is uncertain.

Map

Location

Grid reference TM 1368 1262 (point)
Civil Parish TENDRING, TENDRING, ESSEX

Type and Period

Description

Information from NRHE data transfer. Early Iron Age occupation site was seen on the foreshore before the construction of the sea wall. A former creek could be seen, filled with tidal silt. This contained remains of artificially cleft timber, red hill briquetage, pottery of the 1st century BC and bones of domestic animals. It was clearly an occupied site of some kind, and the remains were such as could have represented a landing wharf on the bank of the creek, possibly broken up by the incursion of the sea. Perambulation of the area by field surveyor in 1951 indicated, revealed no further signs of occupation. <1> <2> "It should be noted that a few early pottery finds from Lion Point were wrongly attributed to the Iron Age". (Possibly applies to two sites although Warren's statement to the Field Surveyor is the only evidence for it as far as we know). <3>

Finds

Sources

  • <1> PERSONAL OBSERVATION: Ordnance Survey. Field Investigator's Comments. Oral via S H Warren.
  • <2> PERSONAL OBSERVATION: Ordnance Survey. Field Investigator's Comments. JET 12-FEB-51.
  • <3> Serial: Sieveking, G.? (ed.). 1971. Prehistoric and Roman Studies. 35. pp.96-97.

Other References

  • NRHE identifier: 387811

Comments

Do you have any questions or more information about this record? Please feel free to comment below with your name and email address. All comments are submitted to the website maintainers for moderation, and we aim to respond as soon as possible. Comments, questions and answers that may be helpful to other users will be retained and displayed along with the name you supply. The email address you supply will never be displayed or shared.

Comments