Skip to main content

Middle to Late Bronze Age round barrow and cremation burials at Elms Farm, Heybridge (EHER 81912)

Please read our .

Summary

Archaeological excavation in 1993 and 1994-1995 recorded two phases of activity: Middle and Late Bronze Age. The principal feature recorded was a small ring ditch, around 8m diameter with a single definite cremation burial in an inverted urn of Middle Bronze Age date within. Two pits also contained small amounts of cremated human bone. There were a series of post holes around the ring ditch, which may have had an internal mount or perhaps a bank. Collectively, these features were interpreted as the remains of a Middle Bronze Age round barrow. Following the initial erosion of the postulated mound, the ring ditch appears to have been allowed to silt up gradually. The upper fills of the ring ditch yielded small amounts of cremated bone. Late Bronze Age pottery was also recovered from the ring ditch fills. A pit to the west of the ring ditch contained a small quantity of burnt human bone and two large sherds of a Late Bronze Age jar. This may be the remains of another cremation burial.

Map

Location

Grid reference Centred TL 8490 0820 (760m by 538m) (9 map features)
Civil Parish HEYBRIDGE, MALDON, ESSEX

Type and Period

Description

1993 and 1994-1995. Archaeological excavations. Middle Bronze Age. The principal feature recorded was a small ring ditch, around 8m diameter. It occupied the relatively high ground of the north end of the 1993 site, though still only at around 4.0m OD. Within the interior of the ring ditch was a single definite cremation burial in an inverted urn of Middle Bronze Age date. Four other heavily truncated features contained dark, charcoal-rich fills; two of these yielded small amounts of cremated human bone. One of the heavily truncated features seems to have been a primary cremation burial alongside that in the urn, whilst the other interior features are more likely to be ‘formalised [cremated] deposits in an intentionally cut feature’. There was a general scatter of post holes across the 1993 site, with a slight concentration in the vicinity of the ring-ditch. Of these, six post-holes and one unexcavated feature appear to be the remnants of a circle around the ring ditch, the eastern part having been removed by a Roman ditch. The ditch sections indicate the presence of an internal mound or perhaps a bank. The poor survival of features within the ring ditch interior may suggest that cremations and other features were inserted into a mound. A further possible cremation burial was found some 44m north-east of the ring ditch. Although severely truncated by ploughing, it included the substantial lower-part of a globular urn but which did not contain cremated bone. On the 1994 site, the Middle Bronze Age was represented by a group of five substantial post holes below what became the site of Late Iron Age shrines and a Roman temple. These averaged 0.6m in diameter and 0.5m depth and possibly formed part of a circular structure, which occupied a slight gravel rise on the terrace before the step down, into marshland alongside the Chelmer river. Late Bronze Age. Following the initial erosion of the postulated mound, the ring ditch appears to have been allowed to silt up gradually. The upper fills of the ring ditch yielded small amounts of cremated bone. Late Bronze Age pottery was also recovered from the ring ditch fills. In addition, feature 2513 contained a small quantity of burnt human bone in its charcoal-rich fill and lay less than 4m to the west of the ring ditch. Two large sherds of a Late Bronze Age jar were recovered from this feature, but it is not clear whether this assemblage represents a cremation burial. Regardless of their precise function, these features demonstrate a degree of continuity in ritual/funerary use of this monument and its vicinity between the Middle and Late Bronze Ages. <1> See aerial photograph <2>. See newspaper articles <3> - <7>. See also <8> - <13>. Note: Middle to Late Bronze Age occupation was also recorded at Langford Road (EHER 81881) to the north of the Elms Farm site, and scattered discrete features from this period were recorded at the Crescent Road excavations (EHER 7793 and EHER 81891).

Finds

Sources

  • <1> Article in serial: Atkinson, M. and Preston, S.. 2001. Prehistoric settlement and burials at Elms Farm, Heybridge. 32(2001) pp.42-74.
  • <2> Aerial Photograph: Strachan, D.. 1999. BW/99/26/11, 12, 13, 14, 15 (5 Frames).
  • <3> Article in serial: Maldon and Burnham Standard. 1997. Roman town set to take its place in history books-newspaper article..
  • <4> Article in serial: Evening Gazette. 1997. Dig site to go down in history books-newspaper article.
  • <5> Article in serial: Essex Chronicle. 1997. Cash to bring history alive-newspaper article.
  • <6> Article in serial: Essex Countryside. 1999. A glimpse into Roman village life-newspaper article.
  • <7> Article in serial: Weekend Telegraph. 1995. Race against time-and the gravel mountain-newspaper article.
  • <8> Report: Atkinson, M. and Preston, S.. 1997. Elms Farm Project, Heybridge, Essex (HYEF 93 & 94): Assessment Report.
  • <9> Serial: Essex Society for Archaeology and History. 1994. Essex Archaeology and History News, 119 (May/ Spring). 119. p 14.
  • <10> DESC TEXT: Heritage Today-English Heritage. 1995. The Civilising of Essex Man - journal article.
  • <11> Article in serial: Gilman, P.J.. 1994. Archaeology in Essex, 1993. Essex Archaeology and History. 25. 239-257. Atkinson, M., p.250.
  • <12> Monograph: Atkinson, M. and Preston, S.. 2015. Heybridge: A Late Iron Age and Roman settlement. Excavations at Elms Farm 1993–5, Volume 1. EAA 154.
  • <13> Monograph: Atkinson, M. and Preston, S.. 2015. Heybridge: A late Iron Age and Roman settlement. Excavations at Elms Farm 1993-5, Volume 2. Internet Archaeology 40.

Related Monuments/Buildings (4)

Related Events (2)

Comments

Do you have any questions or more information about this record? Please feel free to comment below with your name and email address. All comments are submitted to the website maintainers for moderation, and we aim to respond as soon as possible. Comments, questions and answers that may be helpful to other users will be retained and displayed along with the name you supply. The email address you supply will never be displayed or shared.

Comments