Skip to main content

Post-medieval drainage ditches at Waldegraves (EHER 176)

Please read our .

Summary

Remains of angular drainage ditches associated with an area of modern ponds, once thought to be a moat.

Map

Location

Grid reference Centred TL 539 329 (151m by 172m)
Civil Parish WIDDINGTON, UTTLESFORD, ESSEX

Type and Period

Description

Original HER entry merged with NRHE data import: Moat (NR). <1> Remains of angular drainage ditches associated with an area of modern ponds, once thought to be a moat. <2> - <7> March 1950. Field survey. Remains of moat correctly shown on 6". Condition poor. <8> February 1975. Field survey. Not a moat but the remains of angular drainage ditches associated with an area of modern ponds. <9>

Sources

  • <1> Map: Ordnance Survey. 1950-1969. Ordnance Survey 1:10560 (6 inch) Post War National Grid. 1960.
  • <2> RECORD SHEET/FORM: Ordnance Survey. 1950-1990. OS cards. TL53SW07, 1950.
  • <3> RECORD SHEET/FORM: Ordnance Survey. 1950-1990. OS cards. TL53SW07, 1975.
  • <4> Monograph: RCHME. 1916. An Inventory of the Historical Monuments in Essex, Volume I, North-West. p.76.
  • <5> Photograph: Stokes, A.H.. 1976. TL53-038. TL53-038.
  • <6> LIST: Stokes, A.H.. 1976. TL53-038. TL53-038.
  • <7> DESC TEXT: Buckley, D.G.. unknown. SMR.
  • <8> PERSONAL OBSERVATION: Ordnance Survey. Field Investigator's Comments. F1 GWR 30-MAR-50.
  • <9> PERSONAL OBSERVATION: Ordnance Survey. Field Investigator's Comments. F2 PAS 10-FEB-75.

Other References

  • Old SMR Number: TL53-038
  • NRHE identifier: 373881
  • National Monuments Record: TL 53 SW 7

Comments

Do you have any questions or more information about this record? Please feel free to comment below with your name and email address. All comments are submitted to the website maintainers for moderation, and we aim to respond as soon as possible. Comments, questions and answers that may be helpful to other users will be retained and displayed along with the name you supply. The email address you supply will never be displayed or shared.

Comments