Skip to main content

16th century drainage ditch at Moreland's Farm (EHER 9402)

Please read our .

Summary

16th century farmhouse with 18th and 19th century alterations. The alleged moat is more likely to be a large pond and drainage ditch.

Map

Location

Grid reference Centred TL 882 313 (66m by 71m)
Civil Parish WHITE COLNE, BRAINTREE, ESSEX

Type and Period

Description

Original HER entry merged with NRHE data import: Possible moat shown on OS 6" at Moreland's Farm. <1> August 1976. Field visit. Moreland's Farm (name confirmed) is 16th century but with many 18th and 19th century alterations. Not outstanding. There are no indications that the farm was moated, although there is a large pond to the south and a drainage ditch to the east but they do not form a continuous feature. <2> <3> 1978. Field visit. There are two ponds one of which has an extension suggestive of a length of moat. There is a depression to indicate its line. 1m wide. <4> Sketch plan on back of MSRG card, also on back of SMR sheet. <5>

Sources

  • <1> Map: Ordnance Survey. 1958. TL83E. 6".
  • <2> RECORD SHEET/FORM: Ordnance Survey. 1950-1990. OS cards. TL83SE21, 1976.
  • <3> PERSONAL OBSERVATION: Ordnance Survey. Field Investigator's Comments. F1 GJM 06-AUG-76.
  • <4> RECORD SHEET/FORM: Stokes, A.H. (MSRG). 1970s. Moated Site Research Group MSRG card. TL83-051, desc.
  • <5> RECORD SHEET/FORM: Stokes, A.H. (MSRG). 1970s. Moated Site Research Group MSRG card. TL83-051, map, 1978.

Other References

  • Old SMR Number: TL83-051
  • NRHE identifier: 381761
  • National Monuments Record: TL 83 SE 21

Comments

Do you have any questions or more information about this record? Please feel free to comment below with your name and email address. All comments are submitted to the website maintainers for moderation, and we aim to respond as soon as possible. Comments, questions and answers that may be helpful to other users will be retained and displayed along with the name you supply. The email address you supply will never be displayed or shared.

Comments